The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 are both professional-grade graphics cards designed for use in workstations and other high-performance computing environments.

The Quadro P2000 was released in 2017 and is based on the Pascal architecture. It has 1024 CUDA cores, 5GB of GDDR5 memory, and a memory bandwidth of 140GB/s. It supports up to four displays with a maximum resolution of 5120×2880 @ 60Hz and has a TDP of 75 watts.

On the other hand, the Quadro RTX 4000 was released in 2018 and is based on the Turing architecture. It has 2304 CUDA cores, 8GB of GDDR6 memory, and a memory bandwidth of 416GB/s. It supports up to four displays with a maximum resolution of 7680×4320 @ 60Hz and has a TDP of 160 watts.

The main difference between these two graphics cards is their architecture and performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is a more powerful graphics card that offers better performance in tasks such as ray tracing, deep learning, and other compute-intensive workloads. It also has support for real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced workflows, which are not available on the Quadro P2000.

In summary, the Quadro P2000 is a more affordable option that offers good performance for general-purpose workloads, while the Quadro RTX 4000 is a more powerful and expensive option that offers superior performance for compute-intensive workloads and supports advanced features like real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced workflows. The choice between the two will depend on the specific needs and budget of the user.

Another key difference between the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 is their support for APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) and software platforms.

The Quadro P2000 supports DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5 APIs, as well as CUDA and OpenCL for GPU computing. It is compatible with a wide range of professional applications such as Autodesk AutoCAD, Dassault Systèmes SOLIDWORKS, and Adobe Premiere Pro.

In contrast, the Quadro RTX 4000 supports newer APIs such as DirectX Raytracing (DXR), Vulkan 1.1, and NVIDIA OptiX for ray tracing acceleration. It also supports Tensor Cores for deep learning workloads and is certified for use with NVIDIA RTX technology and NVIDIA Studio drivers. The Quadro RTX 4000 is therefore better suited for applications that require real-time ray tracing or AI-enhanced workflows, such as 3D modeling, animation, and visual effects.

It’s also worth noting that the Quadro P2000 is a more power-efficient graphics card, with a lower TDP and power consumption compared to the Quadro RTX 4000. This makes it a good option for users who are looking for a graphics card that can deliver good performance while keeping power consumption and noise levels low.

While the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 are both high-quality graphics cards, they have significant differences in architecture, performance, features, and power consumption. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and budget of the user, as well as the applications and workloads they intend to use the graphics card for.

In terms of pricing, the Quadro P2000 is generally more affordable than the Quadro RTX 4000. The P2000 is typically priced around $450 to $500, while the RTX 4000 is priced around $900 to $1,000. This price difference is mainly due to the RTX 4000’s newer architecture, more advanced features, and higher performance capabilities.

When it comes to memory, the Quadro RTX 4000 has more than double the amount of GDDR6 memory compared to the Quadro P2000. This extra memory allows the RTX 4000 to handle larger and more complex models and datasets, making it more suitable for professional applications that require working with large amounts of data.

Another factor to consider is the warranty and support offered by NVIDIA for these graphics cards. Both the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 come with a three-year limited warranty, which includes advanced exchange and technical support. However, NVIDIA’s support for the RTX 4000 is generally more comprehensive due to its more advanced features and technology.

In summary, the choice between the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 depends on the specific needs of the user. The Quadro P2000 is a more affordable option that offers good performance for general-purpose workloads, while the Quadro RTX 4000 is a more powerful and expensive option that offers superior performance for compute-intensive workloads and supports advanced features like real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced workflows. The choice ultimately comes down to the user’s budget, application requirements, and future needs.

Another factor to consider when comparing the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 is their connectivity options.

The Quadro P2000 supports DisplayPort 1.4, which allows for resolutions up to 5120×2880 @ 60Hz. It also has a single DVI-D port for connecting older displays. The Quadro RTX 4000, on the other hand, supports DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, and USB Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 Alt Mode. This allows for a wider range of connectivity options and more flexibility in setting up multiple displays.

Another key difference between these two graphics cards is their thermal design. The Quadro P2000 has a single-slot design and a lower TDP, which allows it to operate at a lower temperature and produce less noise. The Quadro RTX 4000, on the other hand, has a dual-slot design and a higher TDP, which means it requires more cooling and may produce more noise under heavy workloads.

It’s also worth noting that the Quadro RTX 4000 supports NVIDIA NVLink, which allows multiple RTX 4000 cards to be linked together for even greater performance in compute-intensive workloads. This feature is not available on the Quadro P2000.

In summary, the choice between the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 depends on various factors such as performance, features, connectivity, thermal design, and budget. The Quadro P2000 is a more affordable option that offers good performance for general-purpose workloads, while the Quadro RTX 4000 is a more powerful and expensive option that offers superior performance for compute-intensive workloads and supports advanced features like real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced workflows. The choice ultimately comes down to the user’s specific needs and budget.

One more aspect to consider when comparing the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 is their power consumption. The Quadro P2000 has a TDP of 75W, which means it can be powered by the PCIe slot alone, without the need for additional power connectors. This makes it a good option for systems with limited power supply capacity.

The Quadro RTX 4000, on the other hand, has a higher TDP of 160W, which requires a six-pin and an eight-pin power connector to be connected to the power supply unit. This higher power consumption also means that the system needs to have adequate cooling to prevent the graphics card from overheating.

It’s also worth noting that the Quadro RTX 4000 supports VirtualLink, which is a new open industry standard developed by NVIDIA, Oculus, Valve, and Microsoft. VirtualLink is designed to provide a single connection for VR headsets that combines power, display, and data into a single USB-C connector. This feature is not available on the Quadro P2000.

In conclusion, the choice between the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro RTX 4000 depends on various factors such as performance, features, connectivity, thermal design, power consumption, and budget. The Quadro P2000 is a more affordable option that offers good performance for general-purpose workloads, while the Quadro RTX 4000 is a more powerful and expensive option that offers superior performance for compute-intensive workloads and supports advanced features like real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced workflows. It’s important to evaluate your specific needs and budget before making a decision on which graphics card to choose.